Saturday, March 6, 2010

A little rant?? about an 'Unkathleen Friendly Article'.

so my friend sent me this article, which I thought was... pretty unbelievable and funny, but kind of mean.
Either way, read the article first: here

BEFORE YOU READ THE REST OF MY BLOG -- YOU WON'T GET WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT AT ALL IF YOU DON'T READ THE ARTICLE FIRST(AT LEAST READ THE TITLE OF THE ARTICLE). NOTE THAT IT IS UNKATHLEEN FRIENDLY.

There are many reasons why this article is so funny.
1. Why do people even research about this kind of stuff? Instead of researching ugly men VS good looking men. Why not research CANCER and save lives? Sure, go ahead and spend thousands of money research useless crap and publish an article with no scientific proofs to back up the claim.

2. Speaking of good looking men and ugly men, one can't really have a ugly men VS good looking men contest since that classification is totally subjective. People have their own opinion on who's good looking and who's ugly. There are people out there that like short, fat, acne-filled men, at the same time, there are people that dislike tall, muscular, tanned men.

3. No matter how I look at it, I see no connections between how you look and the amount of white substance one produces. I have nothing more to say about this, unless you have something to add to this...

4. They way they present the article -- how they wrote "WOMEN wanting to get pregnant should find themselves an ugly man". REALLY?! So a woman should go up to an 'ugly man' and say "Hi, You're ugly. Let's fuck!" Oh yea, like he's totally going to agree to that... maybe if he's desperate enough and has no dignity, but most are going to refuse and possibly slap the woman. Real rude of her.

Are people actually going to believe this kind of crap? Second thought, stupid people believe in stupid things and that leads to stupid arguments.

Stupid Woman: "WTF. I AM GOING TO SUE YOU, THIS ARTICLE IS NOT TRUE. I DID IT MANY TIMES BUT STILL NOTHING!!"
Author of the article: "Look at yourself woman, you're in your sixties."
....
I don't really want to imagine rest of the arguments... *imagines anyways*... LOLOLOLOLOL

This article might not be fake, but I know it's definitely not MAGICAL.

~Daniel Chou

1 comment: